Sunday, September 24, 2017

Image result for colin kaeperncik kneeling for anthem
Colin Kaepernick, formerly QB of the San Francisco Forty-Niners sits during the playing of the National Anthem, while a Marine Veteran and purple heart recipient stands tall despite his apparent injuries.


                      These are the images of two very different individuals. One understands the value of freedom and the other clearly does not. One has been given a homeland, where he is free to speak, think, and act how he wishes, without the undue interference of any totalitarian authority. The other earned that privledge. One man goes day to day unconscious  of the organized efforts of hundreds of thousands of men and women everyday who work to preserve those freedoms which he so blatantly takes for granted. The other man lives a life haunted by the constant presence of that prainful price, which makes America "the land of the free and the home of the brave."
                      The world we live in is soft. Our generation is one that understands nothing of earning and all of taking. Colin Kaepernick is a perfect example. 
                       The popularity and publicity of sports stars provides them with a perfect base for advancing agendas, whether they be social, political, humanitarian, etc. An excellent example of this, as I am sure most of us are aware, are the ongoing efforts of J.J. Watt, who has raised over 37 million dollars to date for the relief of the victims of Hurricane Harvey. However, as inspiring as this may be, there are some who abuse their social status, and divide the country with their twisted and warped ideas.
                    In 2016 Colin Kaepernick began kneeling during the national anthem. When asked about the gesture, he justified his actions siting institutional racism within our police forces which targeted specifically African-Americans, but more generally, the lack of social equality in the United States today. 
                    To begin I would like to say that I have no problems with sports stars using their first amendment rights. However,negatively targeting the American flag and the National Anthem is cowardly, for it is by this very same flag and anthem that the right for you to speak thus was earned. And please pay very close attention to the fact that this is earned, men and women die everyday to protect this freedom. The man in the picture above lost his legs for it. What has Colin Kaepernick done to earn his freedom. What have you and I done? We have done nothing. We are free-loaders on the American bandwagon of freedom. What right do we have to insult it. 
                   Some say kneeling is not meant to insult any flag or military people, but then why do you do it during the National Anthem then? What else are you trying to say. If you attack what I believe in then you necessarily attack me as well. Of, course the military people are offended, you attacked the principles the trained and fought under. It is despicable. This is why Alejandro Villanueva came out of the Steelers locker room and stood alone without his team in respect of the national anthem. As a military veteran himself, there was no way he would disrespect those whom he served with.
                  So to summarize so far, I believe the venue and formatting of Kaepernicks protest is inappropriate. Sports is a part of our lives we should be able to escape to. It is a relief of all the drama from our real lives. However, Kaepernick has destroyed that.
                  One of our countries greatest problems right now is the lack of grey area between the two ideologies of hard-core liberals and hard-core conservatives. The problem with the media and society in general is they paint every issue as so black and white when, in reality things are more complicated. In this case, you Kaepernick had clearly drawn a line in the sand which everyone who sits on an NFL sideline must choose. Your either with him in supporting the Black Lives Matter movement and condemning police brutality or you stand and you are obviously a white supremacist.
However, this is not the issue at all. There is a whole range of opinions in the middle. Here is mine.
                 White Supremacist are racist and are evil people. However, Black Lives Matter, and Kaepernick, would have you believe that our police force as a whole are white supremacist. They claim proof for this on the incidents of white police shooting black people. The problem with this is that it is a part-to-whole fallacy. For anyone who does not know what that means, among the rules of logic one cannot prove that a law or trait is characteristic to all those in a group merely because a select few have displayed that trait. I will stand today and fight any white supremacist and condemn their actions. But I also refuse to stand with the pillaging, destructive, disrespectful, and out of control mobs that make up Black Lives Matter and condemn the valiant men and women who defend our country on the inside. Honestly, we have multiple police men and women on campus. If the police are a racist institution, shouldn't at least one of them be a racist. Who wants to go burn and pillage their cop cars? Nobody does. That's because the Black Lives Matter movement is just as out of control as the white supremacist. They are hateful people. They obviously have no respect for the country or those people who protect it with their lives. Their message is not one of love but of hate and achieving a sort of revenge. If their story was honestly just one of love and equality, every player would kneel, but they don't. 
                Instead they stand in unity for the principles that define our nation, a nation which always seeks to improve itself, but which I believe is currently shaming itself at the expense of good men and women who risk their lives to protect us everyday, both at home and abroad. Today I applaud their efforts, as they are sadly being met with such shameful ingratitude.
              

9 comments:

  1. Couldn't have been said better. People need to grow up.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The total lack of respect given to those who risk their lives every single day for our freedom is atrocious.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with Jacob, it is a gross misunderstanding of what it means to be American and it is very childish and selfish. No respect for those who have laid everything on the line and paid the ultimate sacrifice, so we can live in freedom!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I appreciate your frustration, Jacob. Traditions that seem so sacred may feel SO sacred that when someone interrupts it, it seems a thorough outrage. I have felt this way about many disruptive events. I have no answers. I can share what I think and feel (so these are opinions, fwiw).

    I do believe powerfully in freedom of expression. I also believe that when a person has a "platform," earned through hard work that leads to a certain fame, I think it's fine to use that platform as a space for exercising free speech on urgent cultural matters. This, as a way to contribute to positive change, many of which may align with the very conditions that enabled the speaker to have a platform at all. Still, the disruption isn't easy for everyone. I get it.

    I wonder if it would help to try to learn more about what Kaepernik is doing? Silent protest has a long and pride-inducing history in our nation. In fact, the freedoms that protect it are likely one reason why our nation is considered to be so very great (and desirable for those who seek to enter).

    I wonder if you've read from the veterans who support #TakeTheKnee? There are many. It's quite interesting!

    I guess I'd like to ask you to consider the following: Freedom comes at a cost, but what is it worth if we cannot actually be free, express freedom? I think this is the conundrum we face when exploring this vexing set of concerns. I appreciate your careful commentary, and I hope we may continue discussing such matters and learning from one another.

    ReplyDelete
  5. About the "why during the anthem"? question: The singing of the anthem is a genre convention of major league sports. It's a sign of the institution of our freedom. The song is about fighting for our freedom (many don't love the song itself because of its militaristic implications, but these same may find other ways of supporting the shared ideals -- standing, but not singing, for instance). Kaepernik's originally stated reasons for kneeling involved his awareness of racial injustice in the criminal justice system. He began doing it in 2016, following many high-profile cases involving cops fatally shooting blacks, with very little and sometimes no "justice" in the form of a firing or jail time for some cops who seemingly acted questionably. I can't answer to all of the questions regarding each case, but there was at the time a very heated conversation about these institutional injustices. To kneel during the national anthem was Kaepernik's way of rejecting those aspects of our democratic institutions then obviously spotlit for injustice. It was symbolic, just as is the anthem.

    I hope this helps explain, somewhat, why Kaepernik kneels during the national anthem while in his "power spot" or in a space where he is recognized as having any sort of voice or power.

    Does this make some sense?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I appreciate your response to my thoughts, because I believe conversation is the surest road to a conclusion that we can all agree upon. I will try to answer all your questions to the best of my ability.
      My blog was divided into two main parts; first my problems with the particular form of protestation by Colin Kapernick and, secondly, my issues with what they were protesting about.
      Your first question asks, "What is freedom worth is we cannot actually be free." This is a great question. If its not in practice a freedom, but just an ideal that is merely lip-service, then you are absolutely right, its worth nothing. However, this is not happening in the case of Colin Kaepernick. He, as well as anyone who agrees with him, is entirely within his rights to protest whatever he or she wants. Nor has there been any attempts by anyone to stop him. Nor have there been people arguing or challenging this basic first amendment right. Some people say he is being denied a contract within the NFL because of the attention he gets concerning such delicate issues. If this were the case (which I highly doubt, if a legitimately competitive team needed a QB they wouldn't stop at Kaepernick merely because of politics. His playing ability leaves enough questions marks on its own for many teams to be uninterested.) However, even if NFL executives were denying him a contract because of his position, then we would be obligated to recognize that action as an exercise of that person's or executive's right to free speech as well, for if Kaepernick has the right to kneel during the anthem because of his political views then they too have the right to offer or deny him a contract based on their own political views. It would be hypocrisy to say that Kaepernick could kneel for the anthem and then say NFL executives HAVE to sign him.
      I do recognize that there are some servicemen and women who do support the #takeaknee initiative. I find it tragically shameful. However, to call your attention to the general consensus among devoted soldiers, I would call your attention to the letter written by the wife of the man we call "American Sniper," http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/09/26/american-snipers-wife-taya-kyle-open-letter-to-nfl.html
      Finally, you address the question of "why during the anthem?" Here is what disturbs me about protesting at that time. Like I already said, there is ample opportunity for our star athletes to make known their feelings outside of the time dedicated to our nation's greatness. However, protesting during the national anthem is a divisive action more than it is a uniting one or one that brings greater awareness to the public. The anthem, our constitution, and the flag are the triumvirate of what we recognize as the ideal set of standards by which a country much operate. Obviously, people all over the world agree with this because we enjoy one of the richest cultural diversities ever seen in the history of mankind. The ideals of the flag, whether or not they are practiced appropriately, are the one thing that unites us. To attack them is to attack our very fabric as a nation, it would be our undoing. That is the central dogma which we fall back on. If Kaepernick has problems with equality, staying true to the flag is the solution, not the problem. IF you want to question the application of those principles then go ahead, but don't attack them in essence, because in essence they are very good.
      So that was the first part. Nobody argues his right to protest, not do people debate his right to do it during the anthem. However, just because you are allowed to do it, doesn't make it the right thing.

      Delete
    2. Secondly, I am fully aware of why Kaepernick was protesting. He was protesting the institutional racism of police forces in the United States which he believed had been manifested in the (at the time he started) recent killings of young African Americans in shooting involving white police officers.
      I addressed this in my paper but I will address it again. Just because there are a few suspected incidents of racism among a few police officers (and please note that the jury is still out on many of these cases as to whether or not these officers were ACTUALLY racist or if it was just a lie), does not mean that the entire white male police force population of the United States is racist. I will, stand shoulder to shoulder with to condemn any one isolated incident proven of being racist. However, until someone proves their claim that the police force are a bunch of racist that need to be amended and corrected, etc, I will refuse to listen to liberal sheltered people call the protests "inspiring."
      People die in war. People die defending our freedom. That is inspiring. This is the same freedom some people abuse to protest a non-existant problem. That's embarrassing as an American, not something which I or other truly patriotic Americans would find inspirational.

      Delete
  6. Hi Jacob,

    I respect you and am glad you read my comments and decided to reply. I doubt we're going to agree fully, but I appreciate the opportunity to discuss. Thank you.

    To be clear, the context for inviting students to write about this was, in fact, the President's tweet inviting NFL owners to FIRE athletes engaging in silent protest. Regarding your comments in your first reply, I'd call this an effort to "stop him" (Kaepernik). In many ways, I believe (again, my opinion) that many of the players, coaches, and team owners who engaged in #TakeTheKnee over the weekend were doing so to support free speech because they'd felt threatened by the President's words. Many have said so on the record. Freedom and anti-racist protest often go hand-in-hand, or arm-in-arm, as this case shows.

    Freedom projects are quite frequently difficult to fully comprehend, and many of us are presented with visions we'd like to reject or deny. It's history.

    Institutional racism is difficult to explore. Racism, in general is complex and vexing. I have many opinions on the matter, and I see that you have, as well.

    I respect you, Jacob. I respect your willingness to discuss. We may disagree, but I imagine that we both share a desire to support and honor our democracy, each in our own ways.

    Thank you for this opportunity. As I will, I encourage you to continue thinking and learning about these important aspects of our American experience.

    ReplyDelete